How was the empire of Alexander the Great
Alexander the great: ten reasons Alexander conquered the world
The question of how Alexander the Great (356-323) managed to conquer the greatest empire of antiquity within a few years has always provoked new answers. Die WELT finds ten reasons.
Alexander was the son of Philip II of Macedonia and the Epeirotic king's daughter Olympias. His father, who came to the throne as guardian of a prince, was a gifted general and prudent statesman who had made the troubled tribal kingdom on the edge of the Greek world its supremacy. His mother participated in orgiastic cults, was domineering and demonic. It shaped his childhood. Above both family trees, Alexander was a descendant of Heracles and Perseus, great heroes of myth. You became his role model.
Although Philip II also had other wives, Alexander received an education that was in keeping with a crown prince. With friends of the sons of the aristocracy, he went to school with the (then not so famous) scholar Aristotle. At the same time, his father used him for military tasks. In the battle against the Greek city-states near Chaironeia in 338 he commanded the cavalry, whose attack brought victory.
When Philip II was murdered in 336, his army was already in Asia Minor to stage the Panhellenic campaign of revenge against the Persian hereditary enemy. The campaigns under Philip, which lasted more than 20 years, had shaped the Macedonian army into a terrible war machine: 9,000 Pezhetaires in six regiments, heavy infantry fighting with long lances; 3000 Hypaspists, similarly armed, but more agile; 6000 lightly armed men for long-range combat; 1200 hetaires on horseback, the guard, and 600 scouts. In addition there were 7000 hoplites from the Greek states, as many mercenaries and several thousand horsemen.
Art of war
Alexander was the man to use this weapon under any condition. Against this fight with combined arms - a term that is not applied to the armed forces of the Blitzkrieg for nothing - the heavy, gigantic armies of Persia had no chance. At Gaugamela, Alexander realized that the Persians had prepared the battlefield with traps. He maneuvered to the right, thereby pulling the enemy front apart and smashing it with a targeted cavalry attack against the position of the great king. In addition, Alexander could rely on excellent subordinates. And his army. She followed Alexander's charisma to the end of the world.
Despite all his military superiority, it was not his victories but above all his politics that made Alexander the ruler of the world. He did not justify his rule dogmatically, but through a clever analysis of the respective circumstances and the pragmatic solutions that resulted from them. The satrap organization of the Persian Empire was largely taken over.
Above all, however, Alexander refrained from seeing Asia as Macedonian-Greek prey from the start. Instead, local elites were drawn into court, administration and the army. In relation to the former subjects of the great king, Alexander appeared as his successor, not as a foreign conqueror, while he led his army for a long time as a charismatic tribal king.
- Which are the international airports in Uganda
- What is your favorite silent film actor
- Is Mamatha Banerjee better than Narendra Modi
- Is the GTX 1080 Ti out of date
- What is the female equivalent of sir
- Can you create warranty products in Magento
- What are signs of bad grammar
- Why does paper make blunt scissors
- Are American perfectionists at work
- What are the 4Ps of Marketing
- Why someone rarely gets blood while urinating
- What are applications of pressure vessels
- How can Digital India help the unemployed
- Which pets like cats least
- How do archetypes help us understand literature?
- What is the Chinese word for glass
- What would you do without your husband
- Should children be paid to attend school
- What happens when Facebook acquires Quora
- Where is a parking permit used?
- What is Sarah Palin famous for?
- What is meant by insurance
- One Piece is good to watch
- Why do people hate Tony Stark